Briefly discuss the following issues:
1. what did you find (articulate the answers in your own words)
1.1. interesting about the article?


About this article... the thing that I found interesting is its author's interest in meta-design. Meta-design is interesting.


1.2. not interesting about the article?


The article as a whole was not interesting; it struck me as unmotivated and recycled.


2. what do you consider the main message of the article?


Meta-design provides a pathway to transform development into design.

That sentence was just extracted from the conclusion. Actually the article didn't have a "main message" per se.


3. is meta-design an
3.1. interesting concept? why?


Yes, meta-design is an interesting concept. It's interesting because everything today is so mutable. Our daily environment is increasingly configureable and reconfigurable. The methods of reconfiguration become more interesting as that activity becomes more common.


3.2. not interesting? why?
4. what do you consider the major technical and social challenges associated with meta-design?
4.1. technical
4.2. social
5. describe your own experience with meta-design
5.1. with ideas associated with meta-design
5.2. with systems built on meta-design?

.....Briefly discuss the following issues:
1. what did you find (articulate the answers in your own words)
1.1. interesting about the article?


About this article... the thing that I found interesting is its author's interest in meta-design. Meta-design is interesting.


1.2. not interesting about the article?


The article as a whole was not interesting; it struck me as unmotivated and recycled.


2. what do you consider the main message of the article?


Meta-design provides a pathway to transform development into design.

That sentence was just extracted from the conclusion. Actually the article didn't have a "main message" per se.


3. is meta-design an
3.1. interesting concept? why?


Yes, meta-design is an interesting concept. It's interesting because everything today is so mutable. Our daily environment is increasingly configureable and reconfigurable. The methods of reconfiguration become more interesting as that activity becomes more common.


3.2. not interesting? why?
4. what do you consider the major technical and social challenges associated with meta-design?
4.1. technical
4.2. social
5. describe your own experience with meta-design
5.1. with ideas associated with meta-design
5.2. with systems built on meta-design?

.....
Briefly discuss the following issues:
1. what did you find (articulate the answers in your own words)
1.1. interesting about the article?


About this article... the thing that I found interesting is its author's interest in meta-design. Meta-design is interesting.


1.2. not interesting about the article?


The article as a whole was not interesting; it struck me as unmotivated and recycled.


2. what do you consider the main message of the article?


Meta-design provides a pathway to transform development into design.

That sentence was just extracted from the conclusion. Actually the article didn't have a "main message" per se.


3. is meta-design an
3.1. interesting concept? why?


Yes, meta-design is an interesting concept. It's interesting because everything today is so mutable. Our daily environment is increasingly configureable and reconfigurable. The methods of reconfiguration become more interesting as that activity becomes more common.


3.2. not interesting? why?
4. what do you consider the major technical and social challenges associated with meta-design?
4.1. technical
4.2. social
5. describe your own experience with meta-design
5.1. with ideas associated with meta-design
5.2. with systems built on meta-design?


.....