Links
Course Documents
     Main Page
     Assignments
     Contact Information
     Course Announcement
     Schedule and Syllabus
     Course Participants
     Discussion Forum
     Swiki Chat Area
     Lecture Material
     Independent Research
     Project
     Questionnaires
     Previous Course
Swiki Features:
  View this Page
  Edit this Page
  Printer Friendly View
  Lock this Page
  References to this Page
  Uploads to this Page
  History of this Page
  Top of the Swiki
  Recent Changes
  Search the Swiki
  Help Guide
Related Links:
     Atlas Program
     Center for LifeLong Learning and Design
     Computer Science Department
     Institute of Cognitive Science
     College of Architecture and Planning
     University of Colorado at Boulder
[spacer]

1. what are aspects of the course so far that are positive and should be sustained?


The Discussion about topics and the variety of topic sources.

2. what do you think about the following parts of the course?

2.1. Lectures


I like how each lecture has content from a different source. This keeps things interesting.

2.2. Guest Lectures


Again, good to mix things up.

2.3. "practical sessions" (EDC, PitaBoard, Role Playing)


Again, good to mix things up.

2.4. small assignments


I feel it is much more efficient to have more small assignments rather than few large assignments. This way it keeps a steady flow of effort through-out the semester rather than everything happening at the end.

2.5. efforts of getting course participants involved in the course


Having different types of discussions is the key to this. Just opening up the floor on a topic will always get the same people sharing. Mixing in informal presentations very useful.

2.6. use of the Swiki in the course


Swiki is great. The ease of posting assignments is the biggest plus. Seeing how other people approached questions is a close second.

2.7. peer-to-peer learning (e.g., to which extent did it happen in your case)


I like hearing other people who are in my situation (already in thier career) give their 2 cents on issues.


2.8. independent research activities


Good idea, it brings in even more sources of information.

2.9. course projects


Pretty good, a little open ended but I see the value.

3. which improvements would you like to see for the course?


End on time.

4. self-assessment – please let us know how well YOU think you have done in the course Think about this in terms of your performances in:


I feel that I have participated well in the discussions. I always chime in on each topic, even if I don't have a novel opinion.

4.1. please give an honest answer about how much time and effort you have put into your work so far (work hard <--> last-minute effort <--> minimum effort to get by)


I have put in a decent amount of effort to complete all of the assignments and form opinions for the discussions. I would rate this class as an "average" as far as work load. Which is great because I look at this class as more of a "Thought Provoker" as opposed to a "skill developement".

4.2. participation (including class participation; attendance, ...);


I have attended every class and participated in every discussion.

4.3. small assignments,


I estimate that 20% of my assignments have been last minute.

4.4. your effort thus far in the independent research activities


Very good.

4.5. your effort thus far in your project


Medium.

5. What do you hope to learn from this course?


I would like to expand my mind when it comes to approaching problems.

5.1. originally before the course started?


More of a design algorithm course.

5.2. now (close to the end of February?)


Expand my mind when I design things. I don't want to approach problems from only one dimension.

6. anything else you would like us to know?

View this PageEdit this PagePrinter Friendly ViewLock this PageReferences to this PageUploads to this PageHistory of this PageTop of the SwikiRecent ChangesSearch the SwikiHelp Guide