|
       |
 |
The full text of the panel proposal: Final Text of Panel SubmissionAudience Participation:before the conferencewe would like to achieve maximal audience participation - not only at the panel, but before. Everyone is invited to contribute to the panel BEFORE the CHI conference by contributing ideas, asking questions, raising issues - please go to the CHI'2009 Panel Discussion Page at the conference For Audience Participation at the conference, we have amended the plans: In order to achieve maximal audience participation, we will utilize a social computing environment during the panel supporting:
Reviews from the CHI Reviewers:Review-1:
a panel discussion at CHI. The idea of setting up social computing systems at the venue of the panel was one of the strong points of the proposal. I hope this doesn't get lost in the logistics of setting the panel up. I also recommend that the panels spend more time in debate/discussion than in opening statements/introductions for the panelist. Most people coming to the panel would know who these people are. In the past, I have seen that weaving opening statements into the discussion session might help this a little bit. Review-2
construction of knowledge. The goal for the panel will be to synthesize from different perspectives an analytic framework to understand new developments, how to promote rigorous research methods, and how to identify the unique challenges in developing evaluation and assessment methods for creativity research. This panel would be very interesting for CHI, but I would caution the moderator to keep the panel on task and focused as this is topic that is widely applicable and would gather many view points (as stated in the proposal) from the panelists and the audience. As such, I would expect that panelists spend more time in debate/discussion than in opening statements (also stated by another reviewer). Last modified 18 March 2009 at 12:10 pm by haleden |